User agent detail

TwitterAndroid/2.0.1 (122) LG-C550/8 (LGE;hazel;lge;lge_hazel;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGC550closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
TwitterAndroid 2.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeAndroidOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Twitter closeAndroid 2.0.1LGOptimus Chatmobile-browseryescloseclose0.29802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGhazelsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.0.1LGC550closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android LGLGC550closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Twitter Android 2.0.1LGOptimus Chatmobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Android 2.0.1closeAndroid 2.0.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid 2.0.1LGC550closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:27 | by ThaDafinser