User agent detail

NCSA_Mosaic/2.8 (X11; FreeBSD 5.2.1 i686)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeFreeBSD 5.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
NCSA closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NCSA Mosaic 2.8closeBSD 5.2.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.25002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NCSA Mosaic 2.8 FreeBSD 5.2desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NCSA Mosaic 2.8closeFreeBSD 5.2.1closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NCSA_Mosaic 2.8closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mosaic 2.8 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.33702 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NCSA Mosaic 2.8 FreeBSD 5.2.1desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Mosaic 2.8closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:26 | by ThaDafinser