User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (PDA; SL-C860/1.0,OpenPDA/Qtopia/1.3.2) NetFront/3.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/pda/zaurus.yaml
NetFront 3.0 Qtopia 1.3.2Zaurus SL-C860pdaclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
NetFront 3.0NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
NetFront 3.0close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.0close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront 3.0NetFront 0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.0close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24902 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.0 Qtopia 1.3.2SharpZaurus SL-C860pdacloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
NetFront 3.0close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:26 | by ThaDafinser