User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) Runet-Research-Crawler (itrack.ru/research/cmsrate; rating@itrack.ru)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Runet-Research-Crawler close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.065 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows 6.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesRunet-Research-Crawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:26 | by ThaDafinser