User agent detail

K-Touch_T566_CMCC_TD/TBT910514_7470_V0801/10.25.2009 Browser/NF3.5 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-netfront.yaml
NetFront 3.5 T566mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
K-Touch closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.5close K-TouchT566mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
K-TouchT566smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.5 K-TouchT566mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close K-TouchT566closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:24 | by ThaDafinser