User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible;bingbot/2.0;+http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-461.php
yesBingBotBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBingBotBot/Crawler0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesBingBotclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
bingbot 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesBingclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesBingclose0.23801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesBingBotSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesbingbotclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesBingclose0.16201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesBingbotCrawler0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

BingBot 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesBingclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:19 | by ThaDafinser