User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; lg-gm210) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.6.0.199/70/352/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGgm210closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.039 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mobile Safari close LGgm210mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.6WebKit LGgm210smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0close LGgm210closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.6.0.199WebKit 530.13 LGLGgm210closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.6Gecko LGgm210mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.6.0.199close LGgm210closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:18 | by ThaDafinser