User agent detail

schibstedsokbot (compatible; Mozilla/5.0; MSIE 5.0; FAST FreshCrawler 6; Contact: webcrawl@schibstedsok.no;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
FAST FreshCrawler 6close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 5.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.23001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesFAST FreshCrawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 5.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 5.0 closeclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 5.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:15 | by ThaDafinser