User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/534.6 TouchPad/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HPTouchPadclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 534.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 534.6closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 534.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux HPTouchPadtabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux HPTouchPadcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 534.6WebKit 534.6closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 534.6Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 534.6Linux closeclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:09 | by ThaDafinser