User agent detail

sogou spider
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
yesSogou SpiderBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesSogou SpiderBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesSogou Spiderclose0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
sogou closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyessogou spiderclose0.25101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyessogou spiderclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyessogou spiderCrawler0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Sogou "Search Dog" closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesSogou Web Spiderclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:01 | by ThaDafinser