User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-G600/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
G600mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Samsung JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Samsung closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-SGH-G600 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close SamsungG600mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungSGH-G600smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSGH-G600closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SamsungG600mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SamsungSGH-G600Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close SamsungSGH-G600closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:00 | by ThaDafinser