User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ko-KP, en; rv:1.8.1.8) Gecko/20090718 《붉은별》/2.5 NaenaraBrowser/2.0.0.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-redstar.yaml
Naenara 2.0Gecko 1.8.1Red Star 2.5desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.8.1.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.25001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.8closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

ABrowse closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Naenara 2.0.0.8Gecko 20090718Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Naenara 2.0Gecko 1.8.1Red Star 2.5desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:53 | by ThaDafinser