User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; NLCrawler/2.0.15; Linux 2.6.3-7; i686; en_US)KHTML/3.4.89 (like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
NLCrawler 2.0.15close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesNorthern Light Web SearchBot/Crawler0.053 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesNorthern Light Web Searchclose0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.24001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesNLCrawlerCrawler0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNLCrawlerclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 3.4.89closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:43 | by ThaDafinser