User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20110417 IceCat/4.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IceCat 4.0Gecko Linux Desktop0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
IceCat 4.0closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IceCat 4.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
IceCat 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IceCat 4.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 2.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

IceCat 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 2.0Gecko 20110417Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
IceCat 4.0Gecko 2.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
GNU IceCat 4.0closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:42 | by ThaDafinser