User agent detail

HTC-7 Mozart/UCWEB2.0.0.149/47/32079
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTC7 Mozartclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HTC-7 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close HTC7 Mozartmobile-browseryescloseclose0.23501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 2.0 HTC7smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.0.0close HTC7 Mozartcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.0.0.149close closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 2.0.0.149 HTC 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 2.0Gecko HTC7 Mozartmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 2.0.0.149close HTC7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:38 | by ThaDafinser