User agent detail

IE6.0,Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/misc.yaml
HTTP Library JavacloseUNKNOWN closeclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
IE6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Java 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

SRWare Iron closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library Javaclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SRWare Iron mentclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:33 | by ThaDafinser