User agent detail

WebKit/3.7.6, (CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/3.3.0 NewB) PHILIPS-AVM-2013/2.19 (Philips, BDP5600, wired)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
PhilipsBlu-ray Player (BDP5600)tvcloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/philips.yaml
Webkit 3.7.6 BDP5600televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
WebKit 3.7.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.23401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
PhilipsBlu-ray Player (BDP5600)tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

WebKit 3.7.6closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 3.7.6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 3.7.6 PhilipsBDP5600 Blu-ray Playertelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:22 | by ThaDafinser