User agent detail

LG-GM730E
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGGM730Eclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-GM730E closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close LGGM730Emobile-browseryescloseclose0.24801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGGM730Esmartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGGM730Ecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGGM730Ecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows Mobile LGEigen GM730mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGGM730Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close LGGM730Ecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:17 | by ThaDafinser