User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.2) Gecko/20110201
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
vendor/jenssegers/agent/tests/AgentTest.php
2.2close closecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 2.2closeWindows 6.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:2.2closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.23201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows 7desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.2closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 2.2closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 2.2closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 2.2Gecko 20110201Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 2.2Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:17 | by ThaDafinser