User agent detail

Mozilla/3.01 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1 Solaris 2.5.1desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 3.0Gecko SunOS Desktop0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 3.0closeSunOS closecloseDesktopclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 3.0.1closeSolaris 2.5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.25201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Solaris 5.5desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 3.01closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 3.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 3.1 SunOS SunUltraSparccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.34602 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1 Solaris 2.5.1desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:08 | by ThaDafinser