User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S8530/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/2.2 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-dolfin.yaml
Dolfin 2.2 Bada 1.2Wave IImobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-S8530 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Dolfin 2.2closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Dolphin 2.2close SamsungGT-S8530mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Dolphin 2.2WebKit SamsungGT-S8530smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.2close SamsungGT-S8530closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Dolfin 2.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.083 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Dolfin 2.2 Bada 1.2SamsungWave IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S8530Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Dolfin 2.2close SamsungGT-S8530closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:06 | by ThaDafinser