User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru; rv:33.2.3.12) Gecko/20120201 SeaMonkey/8.2.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 33.2.3.12closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 8.2.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.26501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 8.2Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 8.2.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 8.2.8closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 33.2.3.12closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 8.2.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 8.2.8Gecko 20120201Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 8.2.8Gecko 33.2.3Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SeaMonkey 8.2.8closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:53:05 | by ThaDafinser