User agent detail

Motorola KreaTV STB (Linux)/WebKit
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/kreatv.yaml
televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Motorola closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.25801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux MotorolaKreaTVsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.22901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
MotorolaKreaTVtelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:57 | by ThaDafinser