User agent detail

LG-KF700Q Browser/Obigo-Q05A/3.12 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGKF700Qclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.023 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 5.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-KF700Q closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGLG-KF700Qmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGKF700Qsmartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close LGKF700Qcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser LGLGKF700Qcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A LGKF700Qmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGLG-KF700QFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close LGKF700Qcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:57 | by ThaDafinser