User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; U; InfiNet 0.1; Haiku) AppleWebKit/528+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WebPositive/528+ Safari/528+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-haiku.yaml
WebPositive Webkit 528Haiku desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 528closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 528+close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 528close desktop-browsercloseclose0.24201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
WebPositive WebKit Haiku OS desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 528close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit 528 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
WebPositive Webkit 528Haiku desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:56 | by ThaDafinser