User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 SH07B(c500;TB;W16H10)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close DoCoMoSH07Bclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
i-mode Browser 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.0176 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
i-mode Browser 2.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.232 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
DoCoMoSH07Bfeature phoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoSH07Bcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15241 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

SH07Bcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23521 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
MOAP(S) SharpSH07Bmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo SH07Bcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close DoCoMoSH-07BFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
DoCoMo 2.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:54 | by ThaDafinser