User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092816 Mobile Safari 1.1.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Mobile Safari closeGNU/Linux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 1.1.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.9.0.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 1.1.3Gecko 1.9.0.3closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.1872 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Gecko 2008092816Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.9.0Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Mobile Safari closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:50 | by ThaDafinser