User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (AmigaOS; AmigaOS 53.26 PowerPC; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20120327 Firefox/4.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 2.0.1AmigaOS 53.26desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.0468 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Firefox 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Firefox 4.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firefox 4.0.1closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firefox 4.0Gecko AmigaOS 53.26desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firefox 4.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 4.0.1close closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Firefox 4.0.1closeAmigaOS 53.26closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 20120327 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 2.0.1AmigaOS 53.26desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firefox 4.0.1closeAmigaOS 53.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:48 | by ThaDafinser