User agent detail

Huawei/1.0/0HuaweiG6610/SW03 Browser/Obigo-Browser/Q03C MMS/Obigo-MMS/1.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HuaweiG6610closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 3.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Huawei 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 3close HuaweiG6610mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo HuaweiG6610smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close HuaweiG6610closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C HuaweiG6610mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo close HuaweiG6610VFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close HuaweiG6610closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:47 | by ThaDafinser