User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; U;rv: 1.7.13) Gecko/20070322 Kazehakase/0.4.4.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-081.php
Kazehakase 0.4Gecko unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Kazehakase 0.4Gecko Linux Desktop0.0668 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Kazehakase 0.4closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Kazehakase 0.4.4.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Kazehakase 0.4Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Kazehakase 0.4.4closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.7.13closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Kazehakase 0.4.4.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.1248 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Kazehakase 0.4.4.1Gecko 20070322Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Kazehakase 0.4.4.1Gecko Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Kazehakase 0.4.4.1closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:47 | by ThaDafinser