User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Darwin i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20100311 Shiretoko/3.5.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Darwin unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Darwin Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Firefox 3.5closeDarwin closecloseDesktopclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9.1.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.5.5closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firefox Shiretoko (3.5Gecko Mac desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Shiretoko 3.5.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.5.5close closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.1.4closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Shiretoko 3.5.5closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Shiretoko 3.5.5Gecko 20100311Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firefox Shiretoko 3.5.5Gecko 1.9.1 closeclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Shiretoko 3.5.5closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:46 | by ThaDafinser