User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20060127 Netscape/8.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Netscape 8.1Gecko unknownWin98 98unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 8.1Gecko Win98 98Desktop0.0468 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape 8.1closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 8.1closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 8.1Gecko Windows 98desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 8.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 8.1closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 8.1Gecko 1.7.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Netscape 8.1closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 8.1Gecko 20060127Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 8.1Gecko 1.7.5Windows 98desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 8.1closeWindows 98 SEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:44 | by ThaDafinser