User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Vagabondo/Wapspider; webcrawler at wise-guys dot nl; http://webagent.wise-guys.nl/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Vagabondo close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesVagabondoBot/Crawler0.0468 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesVagabondoclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesVagabondoclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesVagabondoCrawler0.0936 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesVagabondoclose0.0156 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:35 | by ThaDafinser