User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en; rv:1.9b3) Gecko Epiphany/2.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Epiphany 2.20Gecko unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Epiphany 2.20Gecko Linux Desktop0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Epiphany 2.20closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9b3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.9closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Epiphany 2.20Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.9bcloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 2.20closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Epiphany 2.20closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0936 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Epiphany 2.20Gecko Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
GNOME Web 2.20Gecko 1.9b3Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Epiphany 2.20closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:33 | by ThaDafinser