User agent detail

Samsung-SPHM530 AU-OBIGO/Q04C1-1.22 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSPHM530closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Samsung-SPHM530 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 4close SamsungSPHM530 AU-OBIGOmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungSPHM530smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 4.1close SamsungSPHM530closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q04C1 Browser Q04C1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.239 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 4C SamsungSPHM530 AUmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SamsungSPH-M530Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q04C1close SamsungSPHM530closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:32 | by ThaDafinser