User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 P900i(c100;TB;W24H11)(compatible; ichiro/mobile goo; http://help.goo.ne.jp/door/crawler.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
ichiro/mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
i-mode Browser 2.0 JAVA NTT DoCoMoP900iMobile Phoneyes0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
i-mode Browser 2.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesGooSearch bot0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesichiro/mobileclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesichiroCrawler0.1404 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

P900icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesGooclose0.0156 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesgooclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
DoCoMo 2.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:32 | by ThaDafinser