User agent detail

ldspider (BTC 2011 crawl, harth@kit.edu, http://code.google.com/p/ldspider/wiki/Robots)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
ldspider close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesTestCrawlerBot/Crawler0 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesTestCrawlerclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ldspider closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesldspiderclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesLDSpiderCrawler0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0312 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:30 | by ThaDafinser