User agent detail

Mozilla/4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Netscape 4.79Gecko unknownWin2000 5.0unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 4.79Gecko Win2000 5.0Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows 5.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Communicator 4.7.9closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.2964 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows 2000desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.79closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.79 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.79 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Communicator 4.7.9 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:28 | by ThaDafinser