User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.1.6 AQUOSBrowser/2.0 (US01DTV;V;0001;0001)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Espial 6.1.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpAquos TVTV Device0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Espial TV Browser 6.1close closecloseTV Deviceclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Espial 6.1.6close media-playercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpAquos Net Plustv0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.1.6close closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2652 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Espial 6.1.6Webkit 531.2 SharpAquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SharpAQUOS TV BrowserSmart-TVcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Espial 6.1.6close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:24 | by ThaDafinser