User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 SonyEricssonC510v/R1DE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SonyEricssonC510vclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close Sony EricssonC510vmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Sony EricssonC510vfeature phoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonC510vcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.0 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson C510vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Sony EricssonC510vmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SonyEricssonC510vFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close SonyEricssonC510vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:22 | by ThaDafinser