User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061125 BonEcho/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8Win95 95unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8Win95 95Desktop0.0468 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firefox (BonEcho) 2.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firefox BonEcho (2.0)Gecko Windows 95desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Bon Echo 2.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

BonEcho 2.0closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.8.1Gecko 20061125Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firefox BonEcho 2.0Gecko 1.8.1Windows 95desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
BonEcho 2.0closeWindows 95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:22 | by ThaDafinser