User agent detail

Samsung-SPHM220 Polaris/5.0 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSPHM220closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Polaris 5.0 Mobile Deviceyes0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Polaris 5.0close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Samsung-SPHM220 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Polaris 5.0closeJVM SamsungSPH M220mobile-browseryescloseclose0.234 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Polaris 5.0 SamsungSPHM220smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 5.0close SamsungSPHM220closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Polaris 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0936 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Polaris 5.0 SamsungSPHM220 Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SamsungSPH M220Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0468 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Polaris 5.0close SamsungSPHM220closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:19 | by ThaDafinser