User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/0 Kazehakase/0.4.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Kazehakase 0.4Gecko unknownFreeBSD unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Kazehakase 0.4Gecko FreeBSD Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Kazehakase 0.4closeFreeBSD closecloseDesktopclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.12close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Kazehakase 0.4.9closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Kazehakase 0.4Gecko FreeBSD desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.8closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Kazehakase 0.4.9closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.12closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Kazehakase 0.4.9closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Kazehakase 0.4.9Gecko FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Kazehakase 0.4.9Gecko 1.8.1FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Kazehakase 0.4.9closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:19 | by ThaDafinser