User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; SemrushBot/0.97; +http://www.semrush.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesSemrushBotBot/Crawler0 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesSemrush BotCrawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesSemrushBotBot/Crawler0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesSemrushBotclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesSemrushBot/0.97close0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesSemrush BotCrawler0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSemrushBotclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:17 | by ThaDafinser