User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-gb) AppleWebKit/418.9.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) SiteCon/8.10.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesSiteConBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesSiteConBot/Crawler0.0468 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesSiteConclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 418.9.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SiteCon 8.10.22closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 418.9.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari 2.0.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 418.9.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 418.9.1Linux closeclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:12 | by ThaDafinser