User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win3.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows 3.1 closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.0.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.0.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.1882 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 3.1 closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.0.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.0.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0634 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.0.0Gecko 20020530Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2808 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.0.0Windows desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:06 | by ThaDafinser