User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows XP) Gecko MultiZilla/1.6.1.0a
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
MultiZilla 1.6Gecko 1.6WinXP 5.1unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
MultiZilla 1.6Gecko 1.6WinXP 5.1Desktop0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows XPdesktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.1092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
MultiZilla 1.6.1.0acloseWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:05 | by ThaDafinser