User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-C3630C_CMCC/1.0 RTK-E/1.0 SHP/VPP-R5 Release/11.17.2009 Browser/NetFront3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 SMM-MMS/1.2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-C3630Cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-C3630C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.4closeJVM SamsungGT-C3630Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront NetFront SamsungGT-C3630Csmartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-C3630Ccloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netfront Browser 3.4 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.4 SamsungGT-C3630Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.4close SamsungGT-C3630Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:02 | by ThaDafinser