User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; HbbTV/1.2.1 (; Philips; 32PFG550978
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/philips.yaml
Opera Devices televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.80Presto GNU/Linux Philips32PFG550978tv0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.80closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux HbbTVcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.80 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.80closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.80 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Devices televisioncloseclose0.0156 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.80closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.80closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:52:01 | by ThaDafinser