User agent detail

Elinks (0.3; FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE i386)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-text.yaml
ELinks 0.3 FreeBSD 4.3desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Elinks closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Elinks 0.3closeBSD 4.3-RELEASEdesktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Elinks Text-based FreeBSD 4.3desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeFreeBSD 4.3closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Links 0.3 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.158 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

ELinks 0.3closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.1092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

ELinks 0.3 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
ELinks 0.3 FreeBSD 4.3desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Elinks closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:55 | by ThaDafinser